Legal Opinion
Lakeside Oil Co. v. Slutsky
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1959PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Slutsky contends the contract constitutes a general restraint of trade and is therefore illegal under sec. 133.01, Stats. In Pulp Wood Co. v. Green Bay Paper & Fiber Co. (1914), 157 Wis. 604, 147 N. W. 1058, this court discussed the “rule of reason” applicable to cases within the general purview of this section and pointed out that the validity of a particular contract depended upon the facts and the extent to which competition was restricted or trade obstructed. The case of State v. Lewis & Leidersdorf Co. (1930), 201 Wis. 543, 230 N. W. 692, cited by the defendant, applies to an entirely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Pulp Wood Co. v. Green Bay Paper & Fiber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Milwaukee Linen Supply Co. v. RingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Rollins Burdick Hunter of Wisconsin, Inc. v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.