Legal Opinion

Levy v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1969No. Civ. 32448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment herein only as it applies to the second, third, fourth and fifth causes of action of their third amended complaint.

The first cause of action was against defendant Capital Unlimited, Inc. only and after trial by court, judgment was rendered in the sum of $194,500, plus attorneys’ fees of $5,000. No appeal is taken therefrom.

The second cause seeks to hold defendants Stanley Ross, Harold Ross and Sam Wishnow, individually, for the sum of $63,250, together with interest and attorneys’ fees, on said defendants’ written guarantees dated June…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bank of America v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Harvard Investment Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. National Computer Rental, Ltd. v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API