Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Computer Rental, Ltd. v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1976No. Civ. 47094Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

I both concur and dissent.

I concur with the majority’s holding that the judgment should be affirmed insofar as it denies to plaintiff any recovery on plaintiff’s claim for a termination fee. I dissent, however, from the majority’s holding that defendant was the “prevailing party” and, hence, was entitled to its attorney’s fees and costs.

*64The Parol Evidence Rule Question

The question at issue with respect to plaintiff’s right to a termination fee under the original lease and the written amendment to the lease is dependent upon whether the parties had entered into an oral…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Salyer Grain & Milling Co. v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API