National Computer Rental, Ltd. v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.
I both concur and dissent.
I concur with the majority’s holding that the judgment should be affirmed insofar as it denies to plaintiff any recovery on plaintiff’s claim for a termination fee. I dissent, however, from the majority’s holding that defendant was the “prevailing party” and, hence, was entitled to its attorney’s fees and costs.
*64The Parol Evidence Rule Question
The question at issue with respect to plaintiff’s right to a termination fee under the original lease and the written amendment to the lease is dependent upon whether the parties had entered into an oral…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Salyer Grain & Milling Co. v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.