Hicks v. Sullivan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a suit for damages for injuries received as a result of the negligent harboring of an ill-tempered and dangerous dog.
The evidence satisfactorily shows the defendants owned and kept in Alturas a medium-sized wolfhound which was over four years of age. The dog had previously attacked other persons. It was known to the neighbors and school children to be ill-tempered. It had a savage nature. It was feared by many as a cross and dangerous dog. The defendants knew of this disposition of the dog. At the request of the chief of police they had provided the dog with a leather…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Domm v. HollenbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Laverone v. MangiantiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Gooding v. Chutes Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Kippen v. OllassonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Owen v. HampsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Groner v. HedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hagen v. LaursenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Nava v. McMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.