Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1932No. Docket No. 4514PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a suit for damages for injuries received as a result of the negligent harboring of an ill-tempered and dangerous dog.

The evidence satisfactorily shows the defendants owned and kept in Alturas a medium-sized wolfhound which was over four years of age. The dog had previously attacked other persons. It was known to the neighbors and school children to be ill-tempered. It had a savage nature. It was feared by many as a cross and dangerous dog. The defendants knew of this disposition of the dog. At the request of the chief of police they had provided the dog with a leather…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Domm v. HollenbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Laverone v. MangiantiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Gooding v. Chutes Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kippen v. OllassonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Owen v. HampsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Groner v. HedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Hagen v. LaursenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Nava v. McMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API