Legal Opinion
Nava v. McMillan
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1981No. Civ. 59683PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants Nelson’s and Sarkozy’s demurrer to the first amended complaint, without leave to amend. We affirm.
Background:
Plaintiff Lorraine Nava, a teenaged minor, through her guardian ad litem brought a personal injury action against defendants Yvonne McMillan, Elma Nelson, Alexander M. Robertson, and Julius Sarkozy. In the first cause of action of her “First Amended Complaint for Personal Injuries (Negligence, Strict Liability),” plaintiff alleged that on February 14, 1978, she sustained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Richard P. v. Vista Del Mar Child Care ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stevens v. RifkinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- State v. FlaniganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Scott v. Chevron U.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- CODY F. v. FallettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Yuzon v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.