Legal Opinion
Broadband ITV, Inc. v. Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided September 29, 2015No. Civ. No. 15-00131 ACK-RLPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS OCEANIC TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC AND TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING INVALIDITY OF UÍS. PATENT NO. 7,631,336
Alan C- Kay Sr,, United States District Judge ■ ...
For the reasons set forth’ below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PÁRT Defendants Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC and Time Warner Cable, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,631,336, ECF No. 474/
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 8, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Listingbook, LLC v. Market Leader, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Cisco Sys., Inc. v. Uniloc United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- BROADBAND iTV, INC. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
- Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.