Legal Opinion
Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 24, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-02847-SIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge
On May 15, 2018, plaintiffs Illumina, Inc. and Sequenom, Inc. (collectively "plaintiffs") filed this action against Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. ("Ariosa"), Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., (collectively "Roche"), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,580,751 ("the '751 patent") and 9,738,931 ("the '931 patent"). Dkt. No. 1. This case was assigned to this Court on June 6, 2018. Dkt. No. 16.
Roche answered the complaint on July 9, 2018 and counterclaimed against plaintiffs, seeking declaratory judgment of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020