Siegemund v. Building Commissioner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
After rescript in Siegemund v. Building Commissioner of Boston, 259 Mass. 329, the New York Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called the Insurance Company), Nathan Ginsburg and Sidney A. Goodman petitioned to intervene. The petitions were denied by a single justice, and the case reported. The facts were fully set out in Siegemund v. Building Commissioner of Boston, supra, and it was there decided that the word “street” as used in the zoning act, means a public way, and that Franklin Garden as shown on the record was not a street.
Ginsburg and Goodman were allowed to appear at the hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Siegemund v. Building Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Rardin v. RardinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Longstaff v. HurdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Steele v. EstabrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wolfe v. GormallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Civil City of Indianapolis v. Ostrom Realty & Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- McCarthy v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Shrewsbury v. Seaport Partners Ltd. PartnershipMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Higgins v. SavoieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.