Lorenson v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Defendant city of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury awarding to plaintiff1 the payment of salary covering a period during which, pursuant to an order of the chief of police, he was temporarily relieved “from duty from his position as” captain in the police department of defendant city. The principal ground urged by the city as requiring a reversal is plaintiff’s failure to file a claim for the salary within the time limited by certain provisions of the city charter. For the reasons hereinafter stated we have concluded that the judgment should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Benner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Tyra v. Board of Police & Fire Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Schulstad v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dettamanti v. Lompoc Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- California State Board of Equalization v. Coast Radio ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.