Legal Opinion

United States v. Hojatollah Tajeddini, Hojatollah Tajeddini v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 26, 1991No. 90-1441, 90-1681, 90-1992 and 90-1545PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was convicted after a jury trial of conspiracy to import heroin and of importation. No timely notice of appeal was filed from the conviction. Petitioner has now appealed from the denial of the following: (1) motion seeking a new trial on the basis of new evidence, (2) § 2255 petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, (3) motion to order for ineffective assistance of counsel, and (4) motion for return of seized property. All four were denied on their face without an evidentiary hearing. As there was much overlap among these filings, we will not now address each motion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Lozada v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Homer McKinley PeakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Mark Hirsch HorodnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API