Legal Opinion

Bernal v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1948No. 52443; protests 124457-K and 124458-K (San Francisco)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

These two cases have been consolidated and tried together. They involve the same entry but not the same issue. In protest No. 124457-K, plaintiff claims that the appraisement, particularly as it covers 16 boxes of cotton stockings, is illegal and void. Therefore, it is contended the matter should be remanded to a single judge for the purpose of reappraisement. (See section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.) Protest 124458-K is directed against the collector’s refusal to reliquidate on the ground of clerical error, which it is alleged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. United States v. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API