Bernal v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ekwall, Judge:
These two cases have been consolidated and tried together. They involve the same entry but not the same issue. In protest No. 124457-K, plaintiff claims that the appraisement, particularly as it covers 16 boxes of cotton stockings, is illegal and void. Therefore, it is contended the matter should be remanded to a single judge for the purpose of reappraisement. (See section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.) Protest 124458-K is directed against the collector’s refusal to reliquidate on the ground of clerical error, which it is alleged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- United States v. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.