Legal Opinion
Bruguier v. Class
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we must again decide the status of certain lands lying within the 1858 boundaries of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. By habeas corpus petition, James Bruguier challenges state jurisdiction in Pickstown, the place of his criminal offense. The United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329, 118 S.Ct. 789, 139 L.Ed.2d 773 (1998) [Yankton Sioux Tribe ], held that unallotted lands ceded to the United States were subject to state jurisdiction. Here we must decide the status of allotted lands, which have passed into…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. PodhradskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- State v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. OwenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Mitsubishi Materials Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. PodhradskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.