Legal Opinion
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2009No. 08-1441, 08-1488PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
In this action the Yankton Sioux Tribe (Tribe) and its members sought declaratory and injunctive relief against officials of Charles Mix County 1 and the State of South Dakota 2 in respect to the boundaries of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. In an earlier stage of the case we held that the Tribe’s 1894 cession of certain land to the United States had diminished, rather than disestablished, the reservation and that some land retained reservation status. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Gaffey (Gaffey II), 188 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1261, 120 S.Ct. 2717, 147…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. PodhradskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Owen v. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Hydro Resources, Inc. v. USEPACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010