Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1997No. 0184-87 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996Published

1DissentCastille, Justice

The majority holds that Claimants’ (the Intervenors) actions did not constitute willful misconduct and that Claimants are therefore entitled to unemployment compensation benefits because their violation of a work rule prohibiting employees from wearing T-shirts attacking or insulting any individual working for appellant, Caterpillar, Inc., did not constitute willful misconduct since the T-shirts which resulted in Claimants’ suspensions did not personally attack Caterpillar’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the rule unfairly restrained Claimants’ ability to support a union position.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Gillins v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. County of Luzerne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API