Nilva v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
Appellants were named as defendants in an indictment containing two counts. Count one charged in substance that defendants Samuel George Nilva, Albert Gardner and the Mayflower Distributing Co., a Minnesota corporation, did knowingly and contrary to the provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 1172 by means of motor vehicle transport approximately thirty-eight gambling devices as defined by 15 U.S.C.A. § 1171, namely, approximately thirty-eight slot machines from Davenport, Iowa, and Rock Island, Illinois, to Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, and that neither the state of Minnesota…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. SharpnackSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Nilva v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Poliafico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. HoelscherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael A. Pintar, United States of America v. Barbara PintarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.