Legal Opinion

Mayr v. Hodge & Homer Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 17, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Attachment Proceedings—Garnishment—Pleas of Interpleader, etc.— Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

December 9, 1896, appellee, a corporation, commenced suit by attachment against the Chicago Sweeper Company, also a corporation, and the writ was served upon the Firemen’s and Merchants’ Insurance Company and five other insurance companies, as garnishees. The indebtedness sued on was evidenced by a promissory note of date June 26, 1896, for the sum of $287.2,0, payable sixty days after date, to the order of appellee, and signed

“ Chicago Sweeper Co.”
“ J. C. Whipple, Pres.”
“ W. A. Mayr, Treas.”

The affidavit for attachment charged the fraudulent conveyance or assignment of the. effects of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beach v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hodson v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Reed v. NoxonIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Campagna ex rel. Kolarik v. Automatic Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Iser Electric Co. v. Ingran Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. City National Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Amcore Bank, N.A., Rock River Valley v. Hahnaman-Albrecht, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API