Legal Opinion

Campagna ex rel. Kolarik v. Automatic Electric Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1938No. Gen. No. 39,783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

The judgment creditors in an action of garnishment appeal from an order discharging the garnishee. The undisputed evidence showed that the judgment debtor was the head of a family, residing with the same. The demand in garnishment was served on the debtor and also on the garnishee on March 29, 1937. The summons in garnishment issued March 31 and was served on the garnishee at 10:30 a. m., April 1. April 8 the garnishee answered that it had no funds or property of the debtor employee. The answer said: “This defendant (garnishee) further states that said defendant, Joseph A. Companion, is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Capes v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hanover Fire Insurance v. ConnorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  4. Wilcus v. KlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bliss v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Taylor v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re EarleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. Baumgarden v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Schmitz v. 75th & Exchange Drug Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API