Legal Opinion
Balon v. Drost
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1993No. A060232PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
20 Cal.App.4th 483 (1993)
25 Cal. Rptr.2d 12
DEANNA BALON, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ETHEL DROST et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Docket No. A060232.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.
November 1, 1993.
COUNSEL
Buchta & Murphy and Alfred H. Buchta for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Strickland & Haapala, John E. Haapala and Steven Sheriff Abern for Defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
KLINE, P.J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant Deanna Balon appeals the trial court's order granting respondent Shawn G. Hurley's motion to quash service of summons and complaint. Appellant contends the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Irving v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Scherer v. MarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ingram v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016