Legal Opinion
Struck v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided September 6, 2001No. 98-1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On June 4, 2001, the Court, in a single-judge order, vacated a June 18, 1998, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that denied as not well grounded, under the version of 38 U.S.C. § 5107(a) then in effect, the pro se appellant’s claim for service connection for degenerative changes to L4-L5-S1 as secondary to service-connected compression fractures of T11-T12-L1 (claim 1) and that denied his claim for an increased rating for his service-connected limitation of motion of the dorsal spine and lumbar spine at LI, currently rated as 20% disabling (claim 2). The Court…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Best v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Johnnie R. Mangham v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- James E. Lawrence v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020
- Johnnie R. Mangham v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009