Legal Opinion

Johnnie R. Mangham v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 16, 2009No. 07-1338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANCE, Judge:

The appellant, Johnnie R. Mangham, through counsel, appeals a February 7, 2007, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision denying his claim for compensation pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1151. Record (R.) at 1-12. The parties each filed briefs, the appellant filed a reply brief, and, pursuant to an order by the Court, the parties filed supplemental briefs. The Court heard oral argument in the case. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the Board decision.

I. FACTS

The appellant served in the U.S. Army from October 1963 to June 1976. R. at 16-17. He was “treated in the Temple…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. Soyini v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  5. Gobber v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael J. Bartlett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  2. James E. Lawrence v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API