Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Worthy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2008No. 1 WAP 2007Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

Because I would hold that the Constitution requires that administrative guidelines be established in advance in order to channel the decision as to whether and when to suspend and resume checkpoint operations due to traffic congestion, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority observes, the stopping of a vehicle and its occupants constitutes a seizure for purposes of both the Fourth Amendment, see City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 40, 121 S.Ct. 447, 453, 148 L.Ed.2d 333 (2000), and Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, see Commonwealth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API