Legal Opinion

Myers v. Simpson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 9, 2011No. 1:11CV552 (LMB/JFA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 18]. The issues have been adequately briefed by the parties, and oral argument will not aid the decisional process. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion will be granted in all respects, except as to the trespass claim, which will be held in abeyance to allow the parties to brief the issue of whether the trespass notice is overbroad.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff pro se Edward Myers (“plaintiff’ or “Myers”) has filed an amended complaint naming as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Enviva Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
  2. Karen J. DeMatteoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API