Legal Opinion

Collinsville Nat. Bank v. Ward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1923No. 12078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for the recovery of money commenced by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error, defendant below.

After counsel for the plaintiffs had made their opening statement, counsel for the defendant moved the court for judgment upon the pleadings and' the opening statement of counsel, which was sustained and judgment entered for the defendant for cost. This action of the court presents the only question for review in this court.

Counsel for the defendant, on the threshold of the case, say that the record before us is insufficient to present this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Stonebraker-Zea Cattle Co. v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Sullivan v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Weeks v. Garibaldi South Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meeks v. Oklahoma Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Progress Brewing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. McIntosh v. v. & L. Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API