Legal Opinion

Lamar v. St. Mary's Hospital Corporation

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 26, 1974No. File 38088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.

It is true that our discovery statute, G eneral Statutes § 52-197, is remedial in character and must therefore, of necessity, be liberally construed with the thought in mind that there is tp be provided thereby a more speedy and less expensive method than other proceedings — for instance, in equity or by deposition. Yet, however expedient the vehicle, even the provisions for discovery as contained in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have their boundaries and limitations, which include, inter alia, that an examination of this nature is not to be proposed in bad faith or so as to annoy,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Pottetti v. CliffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Katz v. RichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Hafford v. ZylaConnecticut Superior Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Cronan v. Politano, No. Cv92 03 96 72 (Dec. 21, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API