Legal Opinion

Katz v. Richman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1932PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The plaintiff has set up eighty-two reasons of appeal, of which fifty-seven deal with claimed corrections of the finding, thirteen claimed errors in the court’s judgment as rendered, and twelve rulings on evidence in the course of the trial. By reason of the great number of errors assigned, the facts set forth in the finding are numerous and too complicated to be condensed into a statement briefer than that contained in the finding itself. Without attempting, therefore, a full statement, the facts may be summarized as follows:

The action was brought by the holder of a mortgage note against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Banks v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
  4. Benton v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  5. Clarke v. BlackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Pottetti v. CliffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Hurley v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API