Sparks v. Beacon Journal Building Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
It will be noted that ,the Beacon Journal Building Co. and the city of Akron were sued jointly, and the proximate cause of-the injuries complained of was alleged to be a defect in the sidewalk, over which the defendant the Beacon Journal Building Co., by virtue of a contract with .the city, had assumed control, and which it had promised to keep in a state of proper repair.
The duty of the city with reference to streets is defined by §3714, GC, as follows:
“Municipal corporations shall have special power to regulate the use of the streets, to be exercised in the manner provided by law. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Peoria v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- McMahon v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bateman v. Forty-Second St., M. & St. N. Ave. Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
- Peteri v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Girard v. SmrekOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Gauber v. Canton Provision Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934