Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stone

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1959No. Appeals, 32 to 36PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The sole question involved in these appeals is whether the Act of 1955 making it a misdemeanor to engage in the budget planning business, as therein defined, is an unconstitutional exercise of the police powers of the state in violation of art. I, § §1 and 9, art. Ill, §7, of the Pennsylvania Constitution or the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. The court below held that the act was unconstitutional and quashed the indictments. The Commonwealth appealed.

The Act of 1955, P. L. 755, 18 PS §4897, provides as follows: “(a) ‘Budget Planning,’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Brazee v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fricker v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. (In Re Fricker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. American Budget Corp. v. FurmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Blue v. McBrideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Skrupa v. SanbornDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API