State v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
SULLIVAN, J.
The question before us is whether a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial solely because his co-defendants at a joint trial were denied the proper number of peremptory challenges to potential jurors.
A State Grand Jury indicted defendants Robert Ojeda, Alfred Hoffman and Gary Hoffman for conspiracy and Medicaid fraud. The indictment grew out of the Hoffmans’ ownership and operation of three nursing homes. Defendant Ojeda was the accountant for the nursing homes and prepared the cost study reports of patient related expenses used to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SingletarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- State v. PersingerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- State v. HammondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Barrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989