Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 11, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

SULLIVAN, J.

The question before us is whether a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial solely because his co-defendants at a joint trial were denied the proper number of peremptory challenges to potential jurors.

A State Grand Jury indicted defendants Robert Ojeda, Alfred Hoffman and Gary Hoffman for conspiracy and Medicaid fraud. The indictment grew out of the Hoffmans’ ownership and operation of three nursing homes. Defendant Ojeda was the accountant for the nursing homes and prepared the cost study reports of patient related expenses used to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SingletarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. State v. PersingerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. State v. HammondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Barrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API