Legal Opinion
Olaf Soot Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 2016No. 15 Civ. 5024PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, District Judge.
Plaintiff Olaf Soot Design, LLC (“Olaf Soot” or “Plaintiff’) has moved for claim construction on 12 terms appearing in U.S. Patent No. 6,520,485 (“the ’485 Patent”). Defendants Daktronics, Inc. and Daktron-ics Hoist, Inc. (“Daktronics” or “Defendants”) has moved for summary judgment of non-infringement on the ’485 Patent. Based on the conclusions set forth below and the claim constructions determined by the Court, the motion for summary judgment on non-infringement is denied.
Prior Proceedings
Plaintiff brought this action for patent infringement on June 26, 2015.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olaf SööT Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Olaf Soot Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Ottah v. Bracewell LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021