Legal Opinion
Ottah v. Bracewell LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00455Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHIKEZIE OTTAH, Plaintiff, 21 Civ. 455 (KPF) -v.- OPINION AND ORDER BRACEWELL LLP, Defendant. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff Chikezie Ottah, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant Bracewell LLP (“Bracewell”),1 for direct and indirect infringement of his patent, United States Patent No. 7,152,840 (the “’840 Patent”). The ’840 Patent contains a single claim for a removable “book holder,” which claim Plaintiff asserts extends to a camera mounting system used by the New York Metropolitan Transit…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.