Legal Opinion
Olaf SööT Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 26, 2017No. 15 Civ. 5024 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sweet, D.J.
Plaintiff Olaf Sööt Design, LLC ("OSD" or the "Plaintiff") has moved for leave to amend its Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, to add a claim of willful infringement and a prayer for relief of enhanced damages against Defendants Daktronics, Inc. and Daktronics Hoist, Inc. ("Daktronics" or the "Defendants").
*397For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion is granted.
Prior Proceedings
On June 25, 2015, Plaintiff brought this action alleging patent infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 6,520,485 ("the '485 Patent"). Background detailing the alleged '485 Patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bromfield v. Bronx Lebanon Special Care Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Champion Power Equipment Incorporated v. Firman Power Equipment IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd. v. Misonix, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Cid Hurtado v. Hudson Fulton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- City of Almaty, Kazahkstan v. Mukhtar AblyazovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.