Legal Opinion
Compton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1993No. 92CA0786PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Carolyn Compton. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to the relevant facts. In May 1989, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident when, as a pedestrian, she was struck by a vehicle driven by a negligent motorist. The motorist’s liability insurance carrier, Guaranty National Insurance Co., paid plaintiff its applicable policy limits of $25,000.
At the time of the accident, plaintiff was insured under three separate policies…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. EkstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Barnett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hyden v. Farmers Inurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Summit Park Townhome Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Bengtson v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Aaron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.