Legal Opinion
Barnett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 1, 1993No. 91SC464PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
Petitioners Gale F. and Gary Barnett (the Barnetts) petition from the court of appeals decision in American Family Insurance Co. v. Barnett, 821 P.2d 853 (Colo.App. 1991). The court of appeals found that a limit of payable benefits clause in the Bar-netts’ automobile insurance policy was valid, and was properly applied to set off Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits received for injuries which Gale Barnett (Barnett) sustained in an accident. We reverse and remand with directions.
I
Gale and Gary Barnett were insured under a contract of liability insurance, policy No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Sylvia Haberman v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ParfreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Adamscheck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Compton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.