Legal Opinion

Aaron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2001No. 00-102PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The issues in this case involve the interpretation and application of "underin-sured" motorist (UIM) coverages in five separate policies of automobile liability insurance issued by State Farm to the appellants. We reverse and remand the district court's summary judgment determination as to the limits of the insurer's maximum potential liability.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Appellant presents this statement of the issues:

Did the trial court err in its interpretation of the underinsured motorist contracts (policies) in holding that the amount paid by the tortfeasor's insurer should…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. WinHealth PartnersWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Mena v. Safeco Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Century Surety Company v. Jim Hipner, LLC and Huey BrockWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
  5. Broderick v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API