Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 8, 1914No. 7495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Rio Grande District Court.—Hon. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

This action was by the Gibbses to compel the Wallaces to accept a certain sum as due from the Gibbses on a note payable to the Wallaces, and to surrender the note; also to reassign and deliver a certain contract for the purchase of land by the Gibbses from a railroad company, assigned to the Wallaces as security for the payment of this note.

The complaint alleges the execution of sundry instruments and conveyances between the parties, and the facts following, whereby it was alleged that the Gibbses were entitled to this relief. In their answer, the Wallaces admit the execution of these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Turpie v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Spear v. OrendorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. Wilson v. MorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cole v. HotzColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Perl-Mack Civic Ass'n v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Hooper v. Capitol Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Jackson Enterprises, Inc. v. MaguireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Meredith v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API