Legal Opinion

Cole v. Hotz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1987No. 85CA1112PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURSI, Judge.

This appeal arises out of two cases which were consolidated in the trial court. In the initial action, Junior A. Cole and Ruby F. Cole were plaintiffs, and Michael V. Hotz was defendant. In the second case, the Coles, among others, were named defendants, and Hotz was plaintiff. The Coles and Hotz filed cross-motions for partial summary judgments. The trial court granted the Coles’ motion, entered judgment thereon, and denied Hotz’ motion. The trial court then amended its order, and, properly under the facts of this case, entered a C.R.C.P. 54(b) order. We affirm.

These claims…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Behlen Mfg. Co. v. First National Bank of EnglewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Bailey v. ClausenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Chambliss/Jenkins Associates. v. ForsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Batterman v. Wells Fargo Ag Credit Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Schmidt v. FrankewichColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Roa v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Kratzer v. Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Share AgencyColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Norwest Bank Lakewood, National Ass'n v. GCC PartnershipColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API