Legal Opinion

Perl-Mack Civic Ass'n v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ETC.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 5, 1959No. 18451PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiffs in error filed an action in the district court in which they alleged that the defendants in error have authorized and approved the creation of indebtedness in an amount exceeding the statutory limit. They asked for a writ of mandamus requiring defendants in error to hold an election in accordance with the requirements of statute. The defendants answered and thereafter moved for summary judgment. This motion was granted and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs are here by writ of error seeking rqyiew and reversal of the judgment.

The facts as they…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Searle v. Town HaxtunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Gude v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Winkler v. State School Building AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Interrogatories by the Colorado State SenateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API