Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. Walling

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1945No. 3036PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq. is entitled to an order of the District Court enforcing an investigatory subpoena, issued by the Administrator in pursuance of Section 9 of the Act, for the purposes enumerated in Section 11(a) thereof, without a prior adjudication by the court to the effect that the industry or activity sought to be investigated by the subpoena is subject to and covered by the provisions of the Fair Labor…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Barsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  3. Shasta Minerals & Chemical Company v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Bowles v. MisleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  5. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API