Legal Opinion
Shasta Minerals & Chemical Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1964No. 7277PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed with the trial court an Application for an Order to Require Obedience to a Subpoena. The Commission was engaged in a duly authorized investigation of appellant and had issued a subpoena duces tecum directing appellant to produce its stockholders’ list and other records showing the names and addresses of its stockholders. The Application was filed pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 77v(b) which provides that a United States District Court on such an application may issue an order requiring the person to whom the administrative subpoena was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McGee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. HermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Empire Gas CorpTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1976
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. BellTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lynn v. BidermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Polaris International Metals Corp. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.