Legal Opinion
Syracuse Chilled Plow Co. v. Leroy Plow Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1916No. 128BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Syracuse Chilled Plow Company against the Leroy Plow Company.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The bill charges infringement of patent No. 865,141, granted to H. Wiard September 3, 1907, relating to reversible sulky plows. The object of the inventor was to furnish means for connecting the plow beams at their front ends to a substantially level hitch bar or draft member, as the specification has it, to increase the efficiency of the plow. The separate elements of the combination were old. The validity of the patent is not disputed. It is, however, urged that the claims in issue are limited to a sulky plow in which the ends of the beams are held in a horizontal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. BowskyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- Hubbard v. King Ax Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- National Binding Mach. Co. v. James D. McLaurin Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Silica Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Auditorium Ventilating Corp. v. Greater Rochester Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929