Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. v. Elizabeth Bridgewater o/b/o Alyssa Bridgewater

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2015No. 93S02-1310-EX-704Published

1DissentRucker, J.

I agree with the majority that the Bridgewater disability discrimination *6claim fails because the alleged discriminatory practice — excluding one of the Bridgewater children from a meal at the Masquerade Ball due to her disability — did not “relat[e] ... to education” within the meaning of Indiana’s Civil Rights Act. Ind. Code § 22-9-1-3(1). However, I disagree that the Bridgewater retaliation claim is somehow derivative of and thus depends upon the disposition of the discrimination claim. Therefore on this issue I respectfully dissent.

Indiana’s Civil Rights Act reflects the State’s public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Lisa S. Fine v. Ryan International Airlines, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Randolph Wilkins, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. St. Louis Housing Authority, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API