Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. v. Elizabeth Bridgewater o/b/o Alyssa Bridgewater
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentRucker, J.
I agree with the majority that the Bridgewater disability discrimination *6claim fails because the alleged discriminatory practice — excluding one of the Bridgewater children from a meal at the Masquerade Ball due to her disability — did not “relat[e] ... to education” within the meaning of Indiana’s Civil Rights Act. Ind. Code § 22-9-1-3(1). However, I disagree that the Bridgewater retaliation claim is somehow derivative of and thus depends upon the disposition of the discrimination claim. Therefore on this issue I respectfully dissent.
Indiana’s Civil Rights Act reflects the State’s public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lisa S. Fine v. Ryan International Airlines, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Randolph Wilkins, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. St. Louis Housing Authority, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.