Legal Opinion

United States of America, and v. Roger Lytle Morehart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1971No. 24992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Morehart had “signed up” for some agricultural conservation money. He was to clear some of his land of brush. The government would pay him part of his cost.

While clearing the land, Morehart’s mechanical equipment used in the process started a fire. 1 The forest service, with its own forces and the help of a municipal fire department, put out the fire on Morehart’s ranch before it reached the adjoining national forest land. But the forest service acted out of self interest.

A jury found Morehart was negligent and the United States was entitled to recover $9,736.58, its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. United States v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Rowson v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Air Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. State v. Black Hills Power, Inc., a South Dakota corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API