Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2017No. S219811PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiu, J.

*565 The Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES)

*323 is California's prescription drug monitoring program. By statute, every prescription of a Schedule II, III, or IV controlled substance must be logged in CURES, along with the patient's name, address, telephone number, gender, date of birth, drug name, quantity, number of refills, and information about the prescribing physician and pharmacy. ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11165, subd. (d) ; all undesignated statutory references are to this code.) The question in this case is whether the Medical Board of California (Board)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Mathews v. BecerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People ex rel. Becerra v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Grafilo v. Wolfsohn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Ahn v. Hestrin CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API