Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 2000No. 26 W.D. Appeal Docket 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

751 A.2d 1136 (2000)

Thomas LOCKWOOD, Administrator of the Estate of James P. Lockwood, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF PITTSBURGH and Allegheny County,

v.

Eric Wilson, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 13, 1999.

Decided May 18, 2000.

Vincent A. Coppola, White Oak, for Thomas M. Lockwood.

Laurence M. Kelly, Montrose, amicus curiae Trial Lawyers Assoc.

John Shorall, Susan E. Malie, Pittsburgh, for City of Pittsburgh.

David V. Weicht, John A. Robb, Pittsburgh, for Eric Wilson.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We must…

Also in this document: Dissent · Nigro; Dissent · Newman.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Lockwood v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API