Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sandusky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*889OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.

Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, appeals from the June 26, 2012 protective order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, which was entered in response to the “leaking” of certain discovery evidence to the media following Gerald Sandusky’s criminal jury trial. The order directed, inter alia, Gerald Sandusky’s criminal defense attorneys to disclose to the trial judge and the supervising judge of the grand jury, under oath, “an inventory identifying all materials supplied to them in discovery and which was subsequently delivered to any member of the defense team…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Carlino East Brandywine v. Brandywine VillageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Newsuan v. Republic Servs. Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API