United States v. Royland Rice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Prior to trial, Royland Rice (“Rice”) waived his right to counsel pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and pled guilty to 'bank robbery and violating the terms of supervised release. Rice contends that his waiver was not knowing and intelligent because he did not understand the nature of the charges or the penalties he faced. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm because the transcript of the Faretta hearing and other evidence in the record indicate that Rice adequately understood the charge and maximum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Floyd BaloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Erik D. ErskineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (HC) Rice v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Rice v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021