Legal Opinion
United States v. Forrester
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 7, 2008No. 05-50410, 05-50493PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The amended opinion filed July 25, 2007, at slip opinion 9045-9066, 495 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir.2007), is amended as follows:
At slip op. 9059, 495 F.3d at 1048-49, second full paragraph, line 5: change the sentence beginning “We conclude that these surveillance techniques are constitutionally indistinguishable ...” to “We conclude that the surveillance techniques the government employed here are constitutionally indistinguishable
At slip op. 9060, 495 F.3d at 1049, continuation…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. PerrineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Rehberg v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. VosburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.