Legal Opinion

United States v. Erik D. Erskine

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2004No. 02-50030PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

Erik Erskine appeals his conviction on one count of threatening to assault or murder FBI agents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B). Erskine contends that the district court erred in finding a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel and allowing him to represent himself in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). We hold that Erskine’s waiver of his Sixth Amendment right was invalid because the court failed to advise him correctly at the Faretta hearing of the possible penalties he faced, and the record…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Floyd BaloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Stenson v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Denard NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API