Legal Opinion

State v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 25, 2018No. Appeal No. 2017AP1430-CRPublished

1Opinion of the CourtHruz, J.

¶ 1 Emerson Lamb appeals a judgment of conviction based upon his no-contest plea to battery by a prisoner, as well as an order denying his post-conviction motion. Lamb argues the sentencing court demonstrated objective bias by making comments prior to sentencing that indicated it was very unlikely he would receive probation. We agree with Lamb that the court's comments-which occurred before it had heard any sentencing arguments from the parties and in a context where no presentence investigation report (PSI) was prepared-showed a serious risk that the court had prejudged Lamb's sentence.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. GallionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API