Legal Opinion

State v. Gallion

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2004No. 01-0051-CRPublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

In all Anglo-American jurisprudence a principal obligation of the judge is to explain the reasons for his actions. His decisions will not he understood by the people and cannot be reviewed by the appellate courts unless the reasons for decisions can he examined. It is thus apparent that requisite to a prima facie valid sentence is a statement by the trial judge detailing his reasons for selecting the particular sentence imposed.

McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 280-81, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971).

¶ 2. Those words are as true today as they were when they first appeared in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States ex rel. Miller v. TwomeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. Richard J. SullaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. Danny Robert AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API